It's not a "bug" we're criticising.
It's a business decision and relationship destroying one at that, that we are criticising.
So in essence, your answer is that yes we're correct that Adobe have chosen to package this crap-ware mcaffee home user product (in my opinion), despite strong rebuff from professionals, and will continue to do so ... by proxy, and virtue of not having "anything additional that I can contribue"
In which case ... i really do hope the fiscal kickbacks Mcaffee and flowing McAffee's way are worth the damage you're doing to customer base and reputation.
The offset of cost (ie fiscal gain mentioned above) is a furphy given you charge for flash development. Likewise with Adobe Reader vs Acrobat Pro.
If you guys can't make a profit without using an inclusion like McAffee AV insidiously packaged, then you have a real serious grave issue.
Choosing not to respond directly to the root cause of these complaints, when we know you recieve notifications of replies, is your acceptance that the above is entirely true but choose not to acknowledge it to us.